Magic Words
We here at The Hatrack were blessed with plumbing issues on Wednesday night: the water heater, unsatisfied with its faith to this point, converted to Buddhism and, to protest the plight of its enslaved brethren, immediately launched into a protest made famous by Buddhist monks in Vietnam: self-immolation.
We were fortunate to not only be home at the time, but to be working in the utility closet, so we were able to arrest the transition to Incendiary Mode before it was complete. Nonetheless, the suicide attempt was successful, and we are without hot water.
Our Realtor wisely suggested we purchase a home warranty, at least for the first year, to cover anything that may break. We did, and Thursday morning, we called to file a claim.
Home Warranty of America arranged a plumber to come inspect the damage and, on the strength of his report, approved the claim. Imagine our surprise, therefore, when an hour later, an HWA agent called to advise us that, after further review, the claim was being denied--the damage was "secondary damage" following the separate failure of another component. We asked for a manager and were sent to voicemail.
A callback sometime later also resulted in being told that a manager was not available. We invoked the Magic Words, however, and within perhaps twenty minutes, a manager called to advise us that the repair would, in fact be covered, and they would call the plumber to authorize the repair.
So, dear readers, in the event that you ever need to deal with Home Warranty of America in the future, be advised that the Magic Words are "insurance commissioner."







Insurance Commissioner
Insurance is a blight on society.
I cannot see how you purchased it given that it relies on spreading risk across many instead of individual responsibility. (Sorry, insurance must be galling to the libertarian.)
Hey, maybe we can get Pelosi behind Total Insurance Reform Act of 2010. We could make Flood Insurance a geographical class priced item, if you live on the beach - your available pools of insureds is other beach home owners and the risk is calculated and they are charged accordingly. How attractive would a high risk but beautiful location be to live if the insurance cost 80% of the assessed value year over year and could be raised in case of loss?
ahhh, I have never hear a good thing about AHM from any consumer.
Insurance
Insurance is indeed a means of managing risk. When voluntarily entered into by all parties, though, there is no violation of rights--we choose to pool our resources to the benefit of all, but nobody is forcing us. There's no violation of liberty until membership is compelled by force. (It also tends to be cheaper for all when it's not mandatory--there's nothing like a captive audience to raise prices.)
And yes, I would support de-socializing flood insurance, and I say that as somebody who has to carry flood insurance (which is subsidized by FEMA). Yes, it would raise my premium, but as you note, it would also decrease the value (and thus the cost) of the property commensurately.
How did AHM get involved?
--
Be cruel. Make someone think.
Post new comment